Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 1404 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-8400 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 49% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G1820 - 357 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 6 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$175.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75244 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
36.28972653362897%
Multi-Core
825
17.375737152485257%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |