Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 938 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - CA$210.0 vs CA$222.88
- Up to 2% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-10600KF - CA$1.27 vs CA$1.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-8400 - 172 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 12 vs 6 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
166
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$210
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11442 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
172
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.3/FPS
97%
Price, CA$
CA$222.88
94%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$222.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11441 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |