Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 640 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 23 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 216 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - CA$142.95 vs CA$210.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i5-8400 - CA$0.74 vs CA$0.97 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
216
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.97/FPS
76%
Price, CA$
CA$210
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15728 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
193
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15728 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |