Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1552 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 14% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i5-8400 - 112 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i5-8400 - CA$112.98 vs CA$210.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i5-8400 - CA$1.01 vs CA$2.14 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
112
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.01/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |