Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 639 days older than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 51 vs 53 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
145
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11848 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |