Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1804 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 29% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron B830 - 170 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 24 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
170
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$382.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$382.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |