Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2284 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 6% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Celeron B815 - 128 vs 121 FPS
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
128
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$108
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5075 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |