Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2744 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 22 than Celeron B815 - 268 vs 245 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
268
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$133.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$133.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |