Buy on Amazon
CA$98.43
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-6100 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6100 is 81 days older than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Performs up to 2% better in Apex Legends than Celeron B815 - 254 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 6 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
254
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-6100 FX6100 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD6100WMW6KGU FD6100WMGUSBX
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron B815
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
