Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1409 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 40% better in Far Cry 6 than Celeron 3205U - 120 vs 86 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 6 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
120
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$150.42
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$150.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |