Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 1145 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 15% better in Resident Evil 4 than Celeron 3205U - 174 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 12 vs 2 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
174
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |