Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2633 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 19% better in Rust than Core i7-2700K - 194 vs 163 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i7-2700K - CA$153.88 vs CA$185.7
- Up to 31% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-2700K - CA$0.79 vs CA$1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
194
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12694 minutes ago
Buy for CA$185.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12693 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |