Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1092 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 14% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-9400F - 58 vs 51 FPS
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - CA$113.5 vs CA$179.34
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$179.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77834 minutes ago
Buy for CA$113.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77833 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |