Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2046 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4770.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 0% better in Control than Core i7-4770 - 202 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i7-4770 - 65 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - CA$128.88 vs CA$153.88
- Up to 16% better value when playing Control than Core i5-9400F - CA$0.64 vs CA$0.76 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
202
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.76/FPS
84%
Price, CA$
CA$153.88
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$153.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12354 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
201
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$128.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12354 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i7-4770 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |