Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1684 days newer than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron 1007U - 143 vs 138 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 16 vs 2 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
143
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$200.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$200.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1007U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |