Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3438 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of FX-4350
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - CA$120.26 vs CA$369.99
- Up to 62% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-13600K - CA$0.63 vs CA$1.64 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-4350 - 226 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
191
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$120.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$120.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1719 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
226
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.64/FPS
38%
Price, CA$
CA$369.99
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$369.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1720 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4350 | vs | Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |