Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2260 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of FX-4350
- Up to 38% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$120.26 vs CA$193.71
- Up to 23% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$1.34 vs CA$1.75 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 23% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-4350 - 111 vs 90 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 16 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
90
81%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.34/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$120.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$120.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
111
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.75/FPS
77%
Price, CA$
CA$193.71
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$193.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4350 | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |