Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 3111 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of FX-4350
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - CA$120.26 vs CA$269.04
- Up to 48% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-12600KF - CA$0.63 vs CA$1.22 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Valheim than FX-4350 - 220 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 16 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
190
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$120.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$120.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7045 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
220
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.22/FPS
52%
Price, CA$
CA$269.04
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$269.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7045 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4350 | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |