Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 3823 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of FX-4350
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - CA$120.26 vs CA$716.28
- Up to 80% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i9-14900KF - CA$0.74 vs CA$3.79 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Forza Horizon 5 than FX-4350 - 189 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 32 vs 4 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
163
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$120.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$120.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7703 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
189
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.79/FPS
20%
Price, CA$
CA$716.28
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$716.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7703 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-4350 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |