Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 99 days older than the cheaper Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Deathloop than Core i5-13400F - 197 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - CA$279.98 vs CA$422.53
- Up to 31% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-13600K - CA$1.47 vs CA$2.14 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
197
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.14/FPS
69%
Price, CA$
CA$422.53
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$422.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
191
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$279.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$279.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13600K | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |