Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Celeron G4900
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - CA$108.00 vs CA$696.59
- Up to 83% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-14900KF - CA$0.42 vs CA$2.41 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 22 than Celeron G4900 - 289 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
257
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.41/FPS
17%
Price, CA$
CA$696.59
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$696.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |