Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 1747 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Celeron G4900
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - CA$108.00 vs CA$279.00
- Up to 51% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 7600 - CA$0.63 vs CA$1.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 27% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G4900 - 217 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
171
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7763 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
217
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.29/FPS
49%
Price, CA$
CA$279
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7763 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |