Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 1462 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Celeron G4900
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X - CA$108.00 vs CA$250.98
- Up to 22% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 7 5700X - CA$0.42 vs CA$0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 81% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G4900 - 464 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
257
55%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
464
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.54/FPS
78%
Price, CA$
CA$250.98
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$250.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |