Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 1638 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Celeron G4900
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600X - CA$108.00 vs CA$319.00
- Up to 45% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen 5 7600X - CA$0.67 vs CA$1.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 54 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 64% better in Rust than Celeron G4900 - 264 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
161
61%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
264
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.21/FPS
55%
Price, CA$
CA$319
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$319 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |