Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 7600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 7600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 276 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 7600.
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 7600 - 225 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - CA$278.98 vs CA$696.59
- Up to 58% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-14900KF - CA$1.29 vs CA$3.10 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
225
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.1/FPS
42%
Price, CA$
CA$696.59
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$696.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
217
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.29/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$278.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$278.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900KF | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |