Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 834 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 134 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 140 vs 250 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
134
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$13.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1791.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,791.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53043 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
88.09716599190284%
Multi-Core
3898
52.62589442419333%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Colfax | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
250 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |