Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-13100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-13100 is 1554 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 205 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$189.0 vs CA$726.1
- Up to 75% better value when playing Control than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$0.92 vs CA$3.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 60 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
201
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.61/FPS
25%
Price, CA$
CA$726.1
26%
Buy for CA$726.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
205
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$189
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$189 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 60 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |