Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-13100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-13100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 369 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-13100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - CA$189.0 vs CA$856.46
- Up to 76% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-14900F - CA$1.04 vs CA$4.37 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 8% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-13100 - 196 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 32 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
181
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$189
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$189 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
196
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.37/FPS
23%
Price, CA$
CA$856.46
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$856.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
60 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |