Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1530 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 11% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$319.99 vs CA$360.9
- Up to 11% better value when playing Dota 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$1.64 vs CA$1.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
195
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.85/FPS
88%
Price, CA$
CA$360.9
88%
Buy for CA$360.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1003 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
195
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$319.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$319.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1000 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i5-4670 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |