Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1197 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4590.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4590 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$172.79 vs CA$382.26
- Up to 55% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$1.02 vs CA$2.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
169
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.26/FPS
45%
Price, CA$
CA$382.26
45%
Buy for CA$382.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
169
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.02/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$172.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$172.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i5-4590 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |