Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100 is 219 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 205 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$106.99 vs CA$369.9
- Up to 71% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$0.52 vs CA$1.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
203
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.82/FPS
28%
Price, CA$
CA$369.9
28%
Buy for CA$369.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
205
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$106.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$106.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |