Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100 is 2342 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100
- Performs up to 18% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 200 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 40% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$221.19 vs CA$369.9
- Up to 49% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$1.11 vs CA$2.18 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
170
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.18/FPS
50%
Price, CA$
CA$369.9
59%
Buy for CA$369.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
200
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$221.19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$221.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i3-14100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |