Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - CA$194.24 vs CA$400.0
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 138 vs 133 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 20 vs 16 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
133
96.37681159420289%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$194.24
100%
Buy for CA$194.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Buy for CA$400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
66.25070901871808%
Multi-Core
5794
63.2947345422766%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |