Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 1892 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 32% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G3900 - 145 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X - CA$66.34 vs CA$249.0
- Up to 65% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 7 5800X - CA$0.6 vs CA$1.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
145
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.72/FPS
34%
Price, CA$
CA$249
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9213 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
110
75%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |