Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2682 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 32% better in Minecraft than Celeron G3900 - 813 vs 614 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 99% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$21.99 vs CA$2360.48
- Up to 99% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-13400F - CA$0.04 vs CA$2.9 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
813
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.9/FPS
1%
Price, CA$
CA$2360.48
0%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,360.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
614
75%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.04/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$21.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$21.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |