Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 1892 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 50% better in Starfield than Celeron G3900 - 69 vs 46 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 68% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600X - CA$66.34 vs CA$207.99
- Up to 52% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 5 5600X - CA$1.44 vs CA$3.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
69
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.01/FPS
47%
Price, CA$
CA$207.99
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$207.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
46
66%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |