Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 31 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - CA$66.34 vs CA$218.88
- Up to 69% better value when playing Stray than Core i7-6700K - CA$0.37 vs CA$1.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 51 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 4% better in Stray than Celeron G3900 - 184 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
177
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17024 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
184
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.19/FPS
31%
Price, CA$
CA$218.88
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$218.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17024 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |