Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 1405 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G3900 - 183 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$31.34 vs CA$203.9
- Up to 83% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$0.19 vs CA$1.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
183
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.11/FPS
17%
Price, CA$
CA$203.9
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$203.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
167
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$31.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$31.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |