Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 3051 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 8% better in Dead Space than Celeron G3900 - 156 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - CA$31.34 vs CA$442.46
- Up to 92% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - CA$0.22 vs CA$2.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
156
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.84/FPS
8%
Price, CA$
CA$442.46
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$442.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
145
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$31.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$31.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Not Available | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |