Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 696 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 9% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 112 vs 103 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 18% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800X - CA$369.9 vs CA$450.0
- Up to 11% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 3800X - CA$3.59 vs CA$4.02 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 24 vs 16 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
112
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.02/FPS
89%
Price, CA$
CA$450
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
103
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$369.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$369.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Matisse | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |