Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 460 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G4900 - 192 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$78.88 vs CA$315.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$0.46 vs CA$1.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
192
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.64/FPS
28%
Price, CA$
CA$315
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$315 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
171
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$78.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$78.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |