Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is 2735 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Performs up to 10% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6100 - 98 vs 89 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
89
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Picasso | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |