Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 2935 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 174% better in Diablo IV than FX-6300 - 260 vs 95 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than FX-6300 - CA$149.98 vs CA$187.01
- Up to 71% better value when playing Diablo IV than FX-6300 - CA$0.58 vs CA$1.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
260
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$149.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$149.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2350 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
95
36.53846153846153%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.97/FPS
29.441624365482234%
Price, CA$
CA$187.01
80%
Buy for CA$187.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2343 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Vermeer | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |