Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - CA$59.57 vs CA$154.99
- Up to 48% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i3-10105 - CA$0.65 vs CA$1.26 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 34% better in Far Cry 6 than FX-6300 - 123 vs 92 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
92
74%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
123
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.26/FPS
51%
Price, CA$
CA$154.99
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$154.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |