Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Athlon 200GE outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2144 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 7% better in Need For Speed Unbound than FX-6300 - 131 vs 122 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than FX-6300 - CA$156.4 vs CA$187.01
- Up to 22% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than FX-6300 - CA$1.19 vs CA$1.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
122
93.12977099236642%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.53/FPS
77.77777777777777%
Price, CA$
CA$187.01
83%
Buy for CA$187.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3655 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
131
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$156.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$156.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3659 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Athlon |
Vishera | Codename | Raven Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |