Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9500 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9500 is 2187 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-9500 - CA$59.57 vs CA$218.95
- Up to 67% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-9500 - CA$0.66 vs CA$2.03 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9500
- Performs up to 20% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6300 - 108 vs 90 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
90
83%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
108
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.03/FPS
32%
Price, CA$
CA$218.95
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$218.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-9500 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |