Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - CA$59.57 vs CA$140.95
- Up to 55% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-10100 - CA$0.47 vs CA$1.04 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-6300 - 135 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
127
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7504 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.04/FPS
45%
Price, CA$
CA$140.95
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$140.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7504 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |