Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600G outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600G is 3205 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
- Performs up to 66% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8150 - 387 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 33% cheaper than Ryzen 5 4600G - CA$93.19 vs CA$139.0
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73916 minutes ago
Buy for CA$93.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73917 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Not Available | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |