Buy on Amazon
CA$899
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $249
Availability
MSRP in USD: $249
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 460 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 25% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G4900 - 216 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$49.99 vs CA$899.0
- Up to 93% better value when playing Dota 2 than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$0.29 vs CA$4.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Ryzen 5 3600XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
216
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.16/FPS
6%
Price, CA$
CA$899
5%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT 6-core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Spire Cooler
Buy for CA$899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227 minutes ago
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
173
80%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 226 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Ryzen 5 3600XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Matisse | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
