Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 826 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - CA$49.99 vs CA$758.34
- Up to 93% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Ryzen 9 3900XT - CA$0.26 vs CA$3.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 8% better in HITMAN 3 than Celeron G4900 - 206 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
190
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13858 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
206
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.68/FPS
7%
Price, CA$
CA$758.34
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$758.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13859 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |